When I've been reflecting on the ordinations I have seen parts from both that are "me". With MoW it is liturgy - im big on it and love experimenting with different types. I get passionate about the way we meet and the way we express our worship for God. With Deacon - it is my passion is the disadvantaged and those who are marginalised. Those who are looked down on sometimes. For me, When I think about the ordinations you feel a call to, I believe it is more of an identity thing and i would prefer being identified by others and God as a Deacon.
When it comes to liturgy I believe the main focus should be engaging liturgy and the biblical text with a focus on the call to serve and to move beyond 'church', and bringing the stories from 'out there' back into the church. Deacons can craft liturgy and worship entirely congruent with their call to serve and work alongside others, advocacy etc.
So I am thinking that this "definition" of my call is the one I am stuck on.
Hi James, this is a good reflection.
ReplyDeleteSo why is it that you want to be identified by others and by God as "Deacon"? Why is that important to you? Conversely, what if the church said "Well actually we think that you're called to be MoW..." or "Well we think that your call is not to ordained ministry...", would it matter to you, why?
I hope that you're getting to know some of your co-workers at CCA and feeling a little less on your own.
Blessings for the continuing journey,
Anita.